Court

Citizen Trump Presidential Immunity Claim Extinguished By Court

Citizen Trump Presidential Immunity Claim Extinguished By Court

The question of whether former United States presidents enjoy presidential immunity from legal proceedings has long been a topic of debate and scrutiny. Unlike sitting presidents, who are shielded from most civil and criminal lawsuits while in office, former presidents do not have the same level of immunity. This distinction raises important questions about the legal status and accountability of former leaders of the nation. Presidential immunity, a concept rooted in the separation of powers and the unique responsibilities of the executive branch, is not explicitly outlined in the United States Constitution. Instead, it has been established through legal precedent…
Read More
Donald Trump Argues In An American Court To Be Above The Law

Donald Trump Argues In An American Court To Be Above The Law

In a contentious legal battle that has captured the nation's attention, former disgraced President Donald Trump is making a bold claim in court—arguing that he should be exempt from all criminal liability for actions taken during his tenure. This assertion raises significant concerns about its potential impact on a democratic society built on the rule of law. Trump's legal strategy centers on the notion that, as a former president, he should enjoy immunity from prosecution. This assertion, if successful, would fundamentally challenge the core principles that underpin a democratic society. At its essence, democracy insists that all individuals, regardless of…
Read More
Why it’s Time to Expand the Supreme Court

Why it’s Time to Expand the Supreme Court

In a historic departure from tradition, a groundswell of voices is advocating for a significant overhaul of the United States Supreme Court—a move that involves expanding the highest judicial body from its current nine justices to thirteen. The proposition has ignited a vigorous national debate, with proponents asserting not only the constitutional validity of such an expansion but also grounding their arguments in a historical context that aligns with the evolving needs of a dynamic society. The landscape of the United States Supreme Court has remained steadfast with nine justices since 1869. However, the call for expansion contends that this…
Read More